From course work to practicum: Learning to plan for teaching mathematics

Authors

  • Susanna(Sue) Mary Wilson College of Education Health and Human Development University of Canterbury
  • Jane McChesney College of Education Health and Human Development University of Canterbury

Keywords:

pre-service mathematics education, planning for teaching, initial teacher education, practicum, pedagogies of practice

Abstract

Learning to plan for teaching mathematics is the focus of an extended research project in initial teacher education. This paper discusses one early part of this project, based on a focus group interview where ten first year primary student teachers reported their planning experiences at the end of their first school practicum. Their one mathematics education course had provided a process for analysing tasks and other planning tools.Findings relate to different phases of planning during practicum, as well as how they accessed tools from course content, and the ways some used internal scripts in analysing, selecting, appropriating, and adapting resources for teaching. Implications for initial teacher education are to consider how planning is decomposed within course experiences, and possible tools or course experiences that attend to how to identify student learning needs as a basis for planning.

 

 

Author Biographies

Susanna(Sue) Mary Wilson, College of Education Health and Human Development University of Canterbury

Sue is a lecturer in mathematics education at the University of Canterbuy where she  teaches both undergraduate and gradute mathematics education courses for primary teaching. She have a masters in teachng and learning (with distinction) and is presently studying towards achieving an EdD qualification. Her research interests include bi -cultural perspectives in mathematics education, pre-service teachers and how they learn mathematics teaching , and planning processes and practices for teaching and learning.

Jane McChesney, College of Education Health and Human Development University of Canterbury

Jane is a lecturer in mathematucs education at the Univeristy of Cantebury where she teaches undergradute and postgradute courses in mathematics education for both prirmary and secondary mathematics teaching. She supervisese doctoral students and her research interests include mathematical practices in school contexts, initial teacher education and mathematics tools and respresentations.

References

References

Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics. In International Academy of Education (Series Ed.), Educational Practices Series:19. Geneva. International Bureau of Education.

Bailey, J. (2015). The challenge of supporting a beginning teacher to plan in primary mathematics. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 69-76). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.

Boerst, T., Sleep, L., Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2844-2877.

Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers, American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.

Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.

Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., & Sullivan, P. (2012). How do mathematics teachers decide what to teach? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(3), 9-12.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the filed, Part 1. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 7-20.

Cohen, L., Morrison, K., & Manion, L. (2011). Research methods in education (7th Ed). London: Routledge Falmer.

Ensor, P. (2001). From pre-service mathematics teacher education to beginning teacher: A study in recontextualising. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 296- 320.

Grossman, P. (2008). Responding to our critics: From crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(1), 10-23.

Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2014-2026.

Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.

John, P. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Re-thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483-498.

Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34.

Author (2010).

Author . (2016)

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A qualitative approach. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

Ministry of Education. (various) Figure it out (series of booklets). Wellington, NZ: Author.

Ministry of Education (2009-2012). Numeracy Professional Development Project booklets. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.

Ministry of Education (2012). Book 5 Teaching addition, subtraction, and place value (revised). Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.

Moss, P. (2011). Analyzing the teaching of professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2878-2896.

Mutton, T., Hagger, H., & Burn, K. (2011). Learning to plan, planning to learn: The developing expertise of beginning teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 17(4), 399-416.

Roche, A., Clarke, D., Clarke, D., & Sullivan, P. (2014). Primary teacher’s written unit plans in mathematics and their perceptions of essential elements of these. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 853-870.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, D. (2012). Teacher decisions about planning and assessment in primary mathematics. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(3), 20-24.

Author (2012).

Author . (2016) .

Author & . (2013).

Author . (in press).

Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications

Downloads

Published

2018-05-18

Issue

Section

Articles